One Nation, One Election: A Path to Efficient Governance or a Federal Challenge?
The concept of One Nation, One Election (ONOE) is no longer just a theoretical debate in India; it is a proposed structural reform to synchronise elections for the Lok Sabha and all state legislative assemblies.
For a nation striving for rapid economic growth and scientific literacy, understanding the massive financial and administrative drain of frequent elections is crucial.
The Hidden Cost of Perpetual Elections
One of the strongest arguments for ONOE is the staggering amount of resources consumed by the current "staggered" system.
1. The Financial Burden: Billions Spent on Ballots
In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, estimates suggest a total expenditure of nearly ₹1.35 lakh crore ($16 billion).
Government Costs: Thousands of crores are spent on logistics, EVMs, and the deployment of millions of polling staff.
Party Spending: High-frequency elections force parties to constantly raise funds, often leading to a reliance on "socio-economic toxicity" and populist freebies to win quick votes.
2 The Time Drain: Politics Over Policy
Perhaps the most damaging cost is the time and effort of our leaders. In the current system, India is almost always in an election cycle.
The Campaign Trap: Prime Ministers, Chief Ministers, and Union Cabinet Ministers spend months every year away from their desks, flying across states to address rallies. Instead of focusing on policy implementation or national security, the nation's top brains are often preoccupied with "winning the next district."
Policy Paralysis: The Model Code of Conduct (MCC) comes into force every time an election is announced.
This halts the launch of new developmental schemes, freezes capital expenditure, and slows down the administrative machinery for months at a time. ONOE would restrict this disruption to once every five years.
Pros: Why ONOE Could Transform India
Optimized Governance Efficiency
By synchronizing cycles, the government can shift its focus from "electoral survival" to long-term governance. This allows for the implementation of complex reforms in sectors like manufacturing and aerospace—areas vital for India's global standing—without the fear of immediate electoral backlash.
Resource and Security Management
Currently, hundreds of thousands of Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) are moved across the country year-round for election duty. This creates a security vacuum in sensitive border areas. ONOE would allow for a one-time deployment, ensuring our military and police resources are better utilized for national defense.
Boosting the Economy
Finance experts suggest that simultaneous elections could add up to 1.5% to India's GDP growth.
Cons: The Challenges of Implementation
Constitutional and Legal Hurdles
Implementing ONOE requires amending at least five articles of the Constitution. It also raises questions about what happens if a state government falls mid-term. Would the entire country go to polls again, or would the state have a "truncated" term?
The Risk to Regional Identity
Critics argue that national issues might overshadow regional concerns.
Logistical Mammoth
India’s voter base is nearly 970 million. Holding elections for the center and all states at once would require a massive increase in the number of EVMs and VVPAT machines, alongside a historic level of logistical coordination across diverse terrains.
Conclusion: Balancing Efficiency with Democracy
The One Nation, One Election proposal offers a solution to the "perpetual election" fatigue that drains India’s wealth and leadership energy. While the logistical and federal challenges are real, the potential to free up our leaders for actual nation-building—rather than constant campaigning—is an opportunity India may need to take to reach its 2047 goals.
As we debate this reform, the focus must remain on ensuring that while we gain efficiency, we do not lose the vibrancy of our regional voices.
Comments
Post a Comment